English (United States)
   
Expertise et savoir faire
R&D
Formation permanente et accompagnement
Qualité et sécurité
Publication scientifiques et pro
Storing fresh equine semen
Bovine semen frozen in egg yolk
Five different vitrification devices
Chilled and frozen semen
Post-thaw viability of dog semen
Cushioned centrifugation technique
Post-thaw sperm parameters in ram semen
Fertility of ram semen frozen in Bioxcell
Fecundity of stored porcine semen
Improved viability following a storage period
Boar semen quality
Motility of porcine spermatozoa
Intrauterine insemination of sows
Liens et Partenariats
IMV fonds ecrans

Boar semen quality

  • Sutkeviciene, N., Andersson, M.A., Zilinskas, H., and Andersson, M.
  • Assessment of boar semen quality in relation to fertility with special reference to methanol stress.
  • Theriogenology. 63, 739-747.
  • 2005
  • Ref ID: SUTKEVICIENE2005

Abstract: The relationship between various semen evaluation tests and fertility in fertile and subfertile artificial insemination (AI) boars was examined. In total, 36 boars, 19 Finnish Landrace and 17 Yorkshire, were included. The average value of three ejaculates extended in an X-cell extender from each boar was used in the analysis. Based on nonreturn results (NR60d, later referred to nonreturn rate, NR%), the boars were divided into two groups: those with poor fertility (NR% < 80, n = 19) and those with normal or above average nonreturn rates (NR% = 83, n = 17). Semen quality was determined after 1 and 7 days of storage at 17 degrees C. Sperm motility before and after each methanol stress was assessed both subjectively and using a computer-assisted semen analyzer (CASA). The sperm cells were stained with calcein AM and propidium iodide and evaluated for plasma membrane integrity under an epifluorescence microscope. Propidium iodide and Hoechst 33258 dyes were used in parallel to stain sperm cells for fluorometric analysis with an automatic fluorometer. Sperm morphology was evaluated in stained smears. The percentage of sows reported as not having returned to estrus within 60 days after AI (nonreturn rate, NR%) and litter size of primiparous and multiparous farrowings were used as measures of fertility. Of the parameters analyzed, only CASA-assessed total sperm motility and methanol-stressed total sperm motility correlated significantly (P < 0.05) with nonreturn rate. Those tests presenting the highest correlation with nonreturn rate were CASA-assessed total motility (r = 0.54, P < 0.01) and subjective sperm motility (r = 0.52, P < 0.01) after 7 days of storage. The highest correlation with fertility at 1 day of storage was shown by methanol-stressed total sperm motility assessed with the CASA (r = 0.46, P < 0.01). The only semen parameter that correlated significantly (r = 0.37, P < 0.05) with litter size of multiparous farrowings was viability of seven-day stored semen stained with Hoechst 33258 and analyzed with a fluorometer. The methanol stress test described here could serve as a rapid test whose results could be used to predict NR% better than motility